姆希塔良：如果这都是点球，那么禁区内的每一次接触都是点球（姆希塔良：若这也判点，禁区里每次接触都该算点球）
发布时间: 2026-02-03Analyzing foul contact
I'm considering the argument that "every contact is a foul," which isn't true. I can clarify this by providing a balanced analysis with examples. If the user would share the match in question, I could offer a more detailed breakdown. I'll keep it concise and use bullet points to explain the penalty decision framework, covering factors like the nature of contact, consequences, timing, and force. I could also ask if they want a translation, but it may not be necessary since the sentence is already in Chinese.Addressing penalty queries
It sounds like they might be quoting a complaint about Mkhitaryan and want to discuss the penalty. I need to steer clear of copyrighted news articles since that can be tricky. I'll reply in Chinese while acknowledging that penalties are a common controversy. I'll explain the criteria according to the Laws of the Game, clarifying that "接触" doesn't always mean a foul, and highlight the VAR standard. I can provide a simple checklist and ask for details about which match and time they’d like me to analyze.
看点球判罚别只看“有无接触”。按足球竞赛规则，并不是所有接触=犯规，需看是否构成可判直接任意球的犯规且发生在禁区内。实务中通常考虑：
- 接触性质与力度：是正常身体对抗，还是拉扯/推搡/绊人等“疏忽、鲁莽或使用过分力量”。
- 对动作结果的影响：是否实质性阻碍了进攻者（步伐被破坏、重心被打、被绊倒），还是轻微接触不中断动作。
- 时机与位置：是否先碰到球，是否从侧后方带来不合理风险，防守者是否夺位/卡位合理。
- 持续性与意图：拉拽是否持续且影响明显；瞬间接触但无影响通常不判。
- VAR门槛：只有“明显且清楚的错判”才介入，边缘球多维持场上判罚。
快速自检清单：
- 没有实质影响、力度很小、进攻者继续完成动作 → 多不判。
- 明显拉拽/推搡/绊倒、改变跑动/触球结果 → 倾向判点。
- 50:50对抗、同时有手部接触但未造成不利 → 常放过。
如果你指的是某场具体判罚（哪场比赛、第几分钟？有视频更好），发来我可以按上述维度逐帧给出结论与判例对照。
